Skip to content
Decide if it’s ready.
Multi-model AI decision-making — GPT · Claude · Gemini · Grok

Stop trusting one AI. Important work needs a team.

One AI can be confidently wrong — and you’re left crafting prompts, hoping nothing slipped. Decidi hands your work to a council of frontier models that do it, challenge each other, and sign it off — ready to send, ship or sign.

😈Devil's Advocate
🌅Optimist
🔧Pragmatist
🧱First-Principles Thinker
⚖️Risk Officer
+ 81 more minds
The Devil’s AdvocateStrong, but you’re assuming users notice the onboarding at all. Where’s the evidence?
The UX ResearcherFair — the empty state is the real first screen for 40% of new users. That’s the gap.
ModeratorVerdict: ship the empty-state redesign first (P0), defer the tour. Prioritised list below…
Why one answer isn’t enough

A single AI answer will sound extremely confident when it’s wrong.

You don’t know what it missed, which assumption it skipped, or where its maker’s training left a blind spot. Decidi runs competing models from different labs against each other — so where one vendor is weak or biased, the others catch it. Independent minds, no single point of failure — before you commit.

The Multi-Agent Trust Stack
Not one AI answer. A challenged one.

We audit your work against 250 known AI failure modes — each layer crosses off the ones in its remit, and anything that slips through is flagged to you, never shipped silently. An illustrative model of the process, not a measured catch rate.

250 risks
~80
~25
~6
1 → you
See the Trust Stack
How it works

Four steps to work you can trust

01
Describe the decision

Type the call you’re weighing — or paste a brief and attach screenshots, decks or documents.

02
Build your council

Auto-recommend a council for your decision, or hand-pick from 86 expert minds.

03
Run the debate

Choose how hard they should challenge it. Watch each mind think and rebut, live.

04
Get the verdict

An impartial moderator delivers one decisive recommendation, with risks and next steps.

What you walk away with

Not a chat log — a deliverable you can act on

Every council ends in a verdict you can act on — and Build it out produces the finished file itself: documents, real Word, Excel and PDF files, even images and short video.

The verdict
Readiness 58 / 100 · Refine
Decision · “Is my app ready to launch?”
Recommendation

Not yet — you’re about two weeks out. The product itself is strong, but the first-run experience won’t convert paid users. Launching now would spend scarce attention on a leaky funnel — clear the fixes below first (and open a private beta in the meantime).

Top risks
  • New users hit an empty state, not the value — high churn on day one.
  • Pricing isn’t legible; “credits” read as friction at checkout.
  • No trust/security page yet — enterprise and cautious buyers bounce.
Prioritised fixes
  • P0 — Redesign the empty/first-run state to show value immediately.
  • P1 — Translate pricing into “what one decision costs”.
  • P1 — Add a Security & Privacy page before paid launch.
  • P2 — Instrument onboarding funnel; run 10 user tests.
Dissenting opinion · The CFO

“Two weeks of runway isn’t free. If the beta validates retention, launch on schedule and fix onboarding in-flight rather than slipping the date.”

Reviewed byclaude-opus-4.8gpt-5.5gemini-3.1-progrok-4.3· each contribution attributed, then a Final QA audit — with a downloadable deliverable.
The difference

One model vs. a council

Before Decidi
  • You ask one AI.
  • It gives one confident answer.
  • You don’t know what it missed.
  • You paste into another model and compare by hand.
  • You still have to decide alone.
With Decidi
  • Multiple models respond — in their own voices.
  • Expert minds challenge the assumptions.
  • Risks and blind spots are surfaced.
  • Trade-offs are ranked, dissent is shown.
  • A moderator hands you one decision memo.
Who it’s for

Never put your name on it untested

Before you file it, publish it, or ship it — let an independent council tear it apart, catch what one AI would hallucinate, and hand you the fixes. Pick your profession.

Brief library

Start from a proven brief

51 battle-tested debate briefs — each tells the council what to evaluate and what to deliver.

Attach photos, screenshots and documents to any brief — just like your favourite chat app.
Models & transparency

Real models. Shown openly.

Three levels, each a genuine mix of frontier models — never one model wearing different hats.

Quick

Fast, low-cost models — a lively first pass.

gpt-4o-minigemini-2.5-flashgrok-4.1-fastclaude-haiku-4.5
Standard

Proven pro models — the everyday default.

gpt-5.1claude-sonnet-4.6gemini-2.5-progrok-4
Deep

The newest, most capable models — for when being wrong is expensive.

claude-opus-4.8gpt-5.5gemini-3.1-pro-previewgrok-4.3
Distinct models

Each mind in a council is assigned a different live model, round-robin across providers.

Attributed

Every contribution is labelled with the model that produced it.

Metered live

Cost is computed from real token usage with a transparent markup — shown before and during.

Graceful

If a model is briefly unavailable, the council notes it and continues — never fakes a reply.

Pricing

Pay for thought, not clicks

Buy credits, spend only what each debate actually uses — metered live. Start free with 3,000 welcome credits, no card required.

Starter
2,500credits

~45 Quick councils, or ~8 Standard councils

Plus
7,600credits

~25 Standard councils, or ~10 Deep councils

Pro
20,500credits

Best for founders, consultants & power users

Studio
54,000credits

Best for teams, agencies & repeat client work

Every council includes the proprietary Final QA audit. A Quick council ≈ 35–70 credits · a Standard council ≈ 200–400 · a Deep council with full rebuttals ≈ 500–1,400. Credits never expire, and you see the exact estimate before every run.

Built for decisions you can’t share lightly

Your prompts and files are used only to run your debate — never to train public models. Encrypted in transit and at rest, deletable on request.

Security & privacy

Make the next call with a council, not a guess.

Welcome credits included · no card required

Common questions

What is an AI council?

An AI council is a panel of multiple frontier AI models — GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok — plus expert personas that review your work together: they debate it, challenge each other, and a Final QA audit reviews the result. You get one cross-checked verdict instead of a single model’s opinion.

What is Decidi?

Decidi is a decision room where you submit important work — a contract, a pitch, code, a launch plan or a big decision — and a council of AI models debates it, then returns a clear, audited verdict plus a downloadable deliverable. It’s built for the moments when being right matters more than being fast.

How is Decidi different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is one excellent model answering on its own. Decidi runs several independent frontier models that challenge each other, adds a Devil’s Advocate, and reviews the verdict with a separate Final QA audit — so you see where the models agree and disagree and catch the blind spot a single model would miss. Use ChatGPT to create; use Decidi to review and decide.

Is Decidi free to try?

Yes. You get 3,000 free welcome credits to run a real council — no card required. After that it’s pay-as-you-go credits or an optional monthly plan, and credits never expire.